I had started the paper but have no time to finish.Please help
Craft a research question on the topic you selected in your first discussion question post. Then locate at least five articles from peer-reviewed journals that pertain to your question that will be used to write the introduction section of your research proposal.
Submit these five citations in the form of an APA-style reference page. Under each citation, write one paragraph summarizing the main points of the article. As you read your articles, keep the following questions at hand; these will help you generate the information about each article.
Based on your reading of the literature, what do you expect to find?
Include a hypothesis and a title page for your submission.
Submit your paper to the M1: Assignment 3 Dropbox by Wednesday, March 11, 2015. All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.
EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY AND MISINFORMATION EFFECT
Premature experiments of the results of preeminent questions disclosed a number of ways an eyewitness testimony can possibly be altered and how the misinformation effect can modify their statements. This Loftus experiment is where people are shown a series of films about a car accident and given different information to attempt their success in changing their testimony. The “misinformation effect” documented by Loftus is one of the best-known and most influential findings in psychology (Loftus, Miller, & Burns, 1978).
What was the speed the vehicles were going when they wrecked into each other? The individuals that viewed the films of the accidents were asked a series of questions, which provoked excessive guesses at the speed the car was going, untrue claims of witnessing broken glass, or if the other car was hit or bumped rather than being crushed (Loftus & Palmer, 1974). Later studies indicated that misleading questions caused numerous amounts of alterations in the reports of the eyewitnesses. For instance, Loftus (1977) had people watch the film of the accident including a green vehicle then later revealed misleading questions that the car was blue hypothetically. These people were subsequently asked to choose the color of the car they witnessed; they shifted the color reaction in the modification of the misinformation effect by choosing a blue-green color, an inclination that wasn’t recognized in research competitors. As a result, numerous deluded competitors stated a color that was a mixture of the before and after accident evidence (Belli, 1988). Competitors could have been persuaded to disclose all of the information wasn’t submitted in the initial event. Competitors were asked, “How fast was the white sports car going when it passed the barn while travelling along the country road?” In all reality, there was never a barn. Research competitors, that weren’t given the wrong information, claimed they seen a barn (Loftus, 1975).
Eyewitness testimonies reveal they aren’t invariably true. Eyewitness testimonies also reveal that things people visualize and perceive regarding an event can simply influence the precision of their impression of an occurrence. Whilst there is argument in how the misinformation effect takes place, it does take place. The misinformation effect may be utilized to clarify several retrieved memories. The misinformation effect elevates important disputes regarding the dependability of the eyewitness testimony.
This article fit in great with my paper! It influenced my ideas immensely and I believe it allowed me to go the distance with my paper.
Belli, R. F. (1988). Color blend retrievals: Compromise memories or deliberate compromise responses? Memory & Cognition, 16, 314–326
Loftus, E. F. & Palmer, J. E. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589.
Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560–572.
Loftus, E. F. (1977). Shirting Human Color Memory. Memory & Cognition, 5, 696–699.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19–31.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more